Posted by David Martin

These ten EU countries support nuclear energy to combat climate change.

These ten EU countries support nuclear energy to combat climate change.

*That’s “Nuclear Power, Yes Please!” in Czech

With the dogmatically anti-nuclear pronouncements of Germany et al getting all the headlines, it’s easy to forget that nuclear energy produces nearly 30% of the EU’s electricity and that it enjoys broad support, from East to West.

Led by the Czech Republic, the governments of Bulgaria, France, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and the UK have all called on the European Commission to ensure that nuclear is able to compete against other low-carbon sources on a level playing field.

In a time of geopolitical upheaval and climate emergency, these governments recognise that nuclear energy offers major energy security advantages (Can other energy sources’ waste be recycled into fresh fuel? Thought not.) and that nuclear has an advantage no other low carbon energy source can match: 24/7 clean electricity (apart from scheduled downtime for maintenance). If we are to meet our climate goals, it’s vital that governments everywhere fight against anti-nuclear prejudice. But words aren’t enough: well-resourced programmes to develop reactors that are safer and cheaper by design are sorely needed.

A revitalised European nuclear industry could grab a major slice of global nuclear market — leading to high-value jobs and exports. But for this to happen, governments must reverse the massive cuts in nuclear R&D spending suffered by labs across the EU. (For example, UK spending on advanced reactor R&D has been slashed by around 95% since 1990.) If such a diverse group of countries can work together to support existing technology, why can’t they work more closely together on the next generation of reactors and fuels?

For example, the ten countries above could lead a European Molten Salt Reactor Programme to rival China’s effort. Countries like Czech Republic, France and UK already have growing interest in molten salt reactor research. Such a programme could, say, aim at developing the optimal MSR for “burning up” spent fuel and other wastes, converting Europe’s existing stocks of nuclear waste into clean energy. Such a grand project would inspire scientists from across the EU, develop a new industry, restore European leadership in nuclear energy, and create a new European clean energy reserve. Not bad for one reactor!




  1. fireofenergy says:

    Search doesn’t work (with anything term) and looking for the article about how Mr. Weinberg accurately forecasted the PPM CO2 for this time period.
    Thanks for informing about the next step UP from fossil fuels!

  2. Robin Gould says:

    The MSRE at Oak Ridge Laboratories in the 1960”s – 1970’s proved that nuclear technology does not have to be about Plutonium production for the military. The EU can perfectly well reserect this peaceful and safe use of atomic power, without rehashing all of the flaws that are associated with Uranium powered electricity generation.

    For all intents and purposes there is enough Thorium to completly satisfy the world’s energy needs for 10,000 years, so why do we not just get on with it? Is it not incentive enough that fossil fuel burning is causing the climate to change?

Leave a Reply

Sign up for our Weinberg Next Nuclear Newsletter
* = required field

The Alvin Weinberg Foundation’s work has helped us to understand the potential benefits of thorium and next generation nuclear reactors, such as the Molten Salt Reactor.

— All-Party Parliamentary Group on Thorium Energy


Our open letter to Greg Clark on Moorside: Government should step in with funding....
- Friday Feb 17 - 12:02pm

Our Technology Officer John Lindberg will soon be giving his TED talk. We are very excited!
- Monday Feb 6 - 12:12pm

Recent Posts

Open letter to Greg Clark on Moorside

by Suzanna Hinson (February 17th, 2017)

Our response to Scottish Government consultation on draft Climate Plan

by Suzanna Hinson (February 10th, 2017)

Leaving Euratom: the government should reconsider

by Suzanna Hinson (January 27th, 2017)

Weinberg Next Nuclear welcomes new Patron

by Suzanna Hinson (January 26th, 2017)

Posts Archive


  • Economics (90)
  • Efficiency (54)
  • Policy (9)
  • Proliferation (34)
  • Regulation (10)
  • Safety (65)
  • Security (18)
  • Technology advances (22)
  • Uncategorized (52)
  • Waste (54)
  • © The Alvin Weinberg Foundation 2014
    The Alvin Weinberg Foundation is a registered UK charity. Charity number: 1155255
    The Alvin Weinberg Foundation web site uses cookies to record visitor patterns.
    Read our data protection policy

    Design by Tauri-tec Ltd and the Alvin Weinberg Foundation