Posted by Laurence Watson

Sodium Nitrate Salt

Sodium Nitrate salt crystals – by Ondřej Mangl via Wikimedia Commons

In the 1800’s if you wanted to impress your dinner guests you dusted off the aluminium tableware – it was a metal once valued more highly than platinum. That was until American and French engineers Charles Martin Hall and Paul Heroult discovered if you used molten salts in the process for extracting the metal from its ore, you dramatically reduced the costs of production. Today aluminium is so cheap that we use it to wrap our sandwiches. A light and corrosion resistant metal, it has also revolutionised countless industries including aircraft design, helping to make flying affordable enough for us all to enjoy.

In order to keep within a reasonable carbon emissions budget, avoiding risks of greater than 2 degrees global warming, we will need to see a massive scaling up of zero carbon technologies and fast. However, it’s still not yet clear which low carbon technologies are going to be able to deliver reliable power at an affordable cost. Could molten salts do for low carbon power what they did for aluminium production?

Molten salts and solar energy

Mirrors reflecting sunlight at a CSP plant

Compact Linear Fresnel Reflectors – mirrors reflecting sunlight onto structure containing molten salts – from Flickr

Molten salts are already used today as the storage medium for Concentrated Solar Power. The huge arrays of parabolic mirrors currently cropping up in deserted parts of the planet, concentrate the suns rays at a tower filled with molten salts. Salts have a high melting point, which mean they are ideal for absorbing the intense heat of the sun’s rays and for storing that heat even when the sun isn’t shining. A heat exchanger then transfers the heat (using water or heated air) to the turbines to make electricity. Concentrated solar power, in countries where it is viable, offer the tantalising prospect of energy from solar 24/7, making it a reliable form of base-load renewable energy. One of the key limiting factors aside from geography, however, is the availability of the particular type of salts being used today. This is a new source of demand for chemicals at an industrial scale and the supply chain has not yet been established so the cost of procuring the salts is currently very high. Salts are, however, very abundant and if CSP technologies take off there is nothing to stop costs tumbling, if and when chemical companies have the confidence to invest in increased production.

Molten salts and grid storage

Germany’s largest aluminium producer, Trimet Aluminium SE, is exploring how to make best use of the large amounts of molten salts it keeps on site for the electrolysis process. By varying the aluminium production rate at its Essen plant, Trimet can store a lot of energy – up to 3,360MWh over two days – to take advantage of the volatile power prices due to intermittent renewables. Using the plant as a virtual battery could pave the way for more of the same, providing the large amounts of grid storage needed to accommodate more renewables.

Molten salts and nuclear power

Molten salts could also be instrumental to a breakthrough in nuclear power. In the 1960’s, at Oak Ridge laboratories in Tennessee, a team of engineers prototyped a nuclear reactor that used salts instead of water to cool the reactor and transport the heat. They were trying to find a reactor that was inherently safe and realised that unlike water salts could tolerate the extreme heat from a nuclear reactor very well, removing the need to keep coolants under pressure, vastly simplifying things and reducing the risk of accident. The Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) has become one of the most talked about alternative nuclear reactor designs in recent years – thanks in no small part to the work of ex-NASA engineer Kirk Sorensen who unearthed reams of information about the MSRE and the men behind it making it available on the web. The question is, dogged by high costs and a legacy of rare but nevertheless significant accidents, can the nuclear industry be persuaded to look again at reactors using molten salts? There is already research underway in the US and China and even a small under-funded effort in the EU. Several new start-ups have emerged relatively recently. If the early promise of molten salts can be properly exploited they could offer a much simpler alternative to today’s reactors – helping nuclear to live up to its true potential in the fight against climate change.

CCS

The last area where molten salts could have a role to play is in Carbon Capture and Storage. Even though we are burning fossil fuels at an alarming rate, we are not going to run out of them any time soon. If we want to stay within a safe global temperature increase we will have to stick to a carbon budget of emissions that is fast running out. Either the fossil fuels will need to stay in the ground or, if they are dug up, they will need to be burned in a way that captures and stores the greenhouse gas pollutants. The CCS plants being built today use solvents to scrub out the unwanted gases, which are then concentrated ready for transportation and permanent storage (in, for example, depleted gas fields or saline aquifers). However, there is another way of scrubbing CO2 from flue gases that is currently being explored in the lab and that is to bubble it through molten salts containing a metal anode and cathode. Add an electrical charge and the carbon then plates itself out onto the metal rods giving a pure form of carbon – a useful commodity that could be sold. This form of CCS requires energy to run it since reversing the combustion process, which creates the CO2, cannot be done without additional energy being used. However, the prize of being able to harvest pure carbon – a commodity much in demand for a range of applications including electric vehicle batteries – could mean the economics stack up especially if the extra energy to power the process is being harnessed from waste heat, new kinds of nuclear batteries, and renewables.

The UK has a proud heritage of research in molten salts and there are academic networks like the REFINE consortium and the RSC’s Molten Salts Discussion Group devoted to the subject with scientists from numerous Universities participating. If we want to be at the cutting edge of low carbon technology development we should seriously consider how to increase support for molten salts research and stimulate more commercial investment in the field.

We have no doubt that human ingenuity will crack the challenge of delivering large scale, reliable low carbon energy – the question is whether we do it quickly enough to avoid locking ourselves in to runaway climate change. Our industrial chemists could hold the key and it is high time we supported them in the task of developing the technologies we so urgently need.

Comments

  1. tammons says:

    Another possibility for capturing carbon is a process researched by the Navy is to use electrolysis like method to take carbonic acid out of seawater and make hydrocarbons. Of course it would require lots of cheap electrical power to make it practical, enter LFTRs, but it would also deacidify the oceans and create a closed carbon cycle. I know, it would take a tremendous amount of power to do this, but this is what the remediation of the earth will require to keep it habitable.

  2. Brian Bingham says:

    I really enjoy this website. But, I have to wonder how the CCS section got included in this article. simple thermodynamics will tell you that it will take more energy to break the carbon oxygen bond than was released in the burning of the carbon fuel. Any one want to buy a water powed car.

    Please forgive the negative comment. I really enjoy this site.

    • Martin Kral says:

      Brian, it is all about the source of money. Whatever energy solutions evolve in the future, clean fossil has to be part of it because of the ‘scale’ that it dominates the energy market today. As we have seen in Germany, fossil has been a fall back position for renewable because it is readily available and cheap source of income (to make a profit). Besides CCS, direct carbon fuel cells (DCFC) is another possibility for the use of coal as a cleaner source of energy.

    • nick says:

      We burn hydrocarbons for energy. Not just carbon on its own. So the whole process is energy positive just a certain amount less so.

  3. Jim Fisher says:

    I see no violations of thermodynamics here. What is proposed is “bubbling” CO2 through electrically charged salts to collect the carbon. If that was the end of it, you’d be right. But they are proposing to then market the high-quality carbon for resale. That is no more a violation than producing steel.

  4. KitemanSA says:

    Though CCS with MSs doesn’t make sense as a way to make petro-carbon usage any better, it may be a good way to reduce the CO2 content of the ocean. Use LFTRs (Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors) to power the carbon reduction and use the carbon as a soil amendment.

  5. Brian Bingham says:

    My comment was not on carbon capture. But on the proposal to turn co2 into o2 and pure carbon. No matter what process you use, thermodynamics, my major in college, tells us that it will take more energy to turn co2 into carbon than was release in making the co2.

  6. Tobias says:

    When you burn methane:
    CH4 –> CO2 + 2H2O
    You could turn the CO2 back to C and O2, and keep some of the energy you got from burning the H’s.

  7. Bill McNew says:

    I found it fascinating to study that the chemistry of an aluminium production plant could be used as a virtual battery due to the use of molten salts. every particular topic here as an extreme amount of usefulness that has yet to be fully realized. I truly believe that all of them could be easily used if government regulations we’re not in the way. In many cases government regulations don’t really tend to make anyone more safe so much as keep them from moving ahead in society.but the word is slowly leaking out through the internet about the fantastic and unlimited potential of nuclear power from thorium using molten salt as a coolant.

Leave a Reply

Sign up for our Weinberg Next Nuclear Newsletter
* = required field

I am pleased to support the Alvin Weinberg Foundation’s mission to communicate honestly with the public and to raise awareness of the potential of this maligned energy source amongst campaigners and the media.

— George Monbiot

@thorium_wf

This tribalism is the problem -there is no one solution, we need both nuclear and renewables to replace fossil fuels https://t.co/zq5VITkKyF
- Monday Feb 20 - 11:03am

Our open letter to Greg Clark on Moorside: Government should step in with funding.... https://t.co/osuRxb6g3x
- Friday Feb 17 - 12:02pm

Recent Posts

Open letter to Greg Clark on Moorside

by Suzanna Hinson (February 17th, 2017)

Our response to Scottish Government consultation on draft Climate Plan

by Suzanna Hinson (February 10th, 2017)

Leaving Euratom: the government should reconsider

by Suzanna Hinson (January 27th, 2017)

Weinberg Next Nuclear welcomes new Patron

by Suzanna Hinson (January 26th, 2017)

Posts Archive

Categories

  • Economics (90)
  • Efficiency (54)
  • Policy (9)
  • Proliferation (34)
  • Regulation (10)
  • Safety (65)
  • Security (18)
  • Technology advances (22)
  • Uncategorized (52)
  • Waste (54)
  • © The Alvin Weinberg Foundation 2014
    The Alvin Weinberg Foundation is a registered UK charity. Charity number: 1155255
    The Alvin Weinberg Foundation web site uses cookies to record visitor patterns.
    Read our data protection policy

    Design by Tauri-tec Ltd and the Alvin Weinberg Foundation